
Prof. H. Nastase
Originally uploaded by Jedi.RC
October 20, 23, 27: In celebration of 10 years of AdS/CFT, the Department of Physics of TMU had the Series of Lectures :
“AdS/CFT Correspondence: relations between gauge theories and strings “
LECTURE NOTES AVAILABLE HERE
By Prof. Horatiu Nastase (Tokyo Inst. Tech.), organized by Prof. Sergei V. Ketov.
Being invited by Prof. Ketov himself it was an offer I couldn’t refuse!. It was a great experience though at the end I didn’t understand much, in fact I must admit I was lost.
Even so, I learned a lot not just about the interplay of Physics with Mathematics but also the way that the physicist work at the cutting edge hot topics. In particular it is very amusing for me all the slang used to define their concepts. I was also deeply moved to find everyday concepts for me – All about differential geometry, Riemmanian Metrics, Geodesics, Flows, etc.. – in their theory.
Nevertheless, there were things troubling me – maybe due to my ignorance- regarding the formalism of their actions… e.g. when they talk about Riemmanian metrics using differential forms, Do they really know what differential forms are? Do they know they are dealing with sections of the tangent bundle of the corresponding manifold? Do they care that alternative forms can be viewed as elements of the alternative algebra as well as elements of the exterior algebra?
Maybe yes, maybe no. My guess is that the Pro ones they know but they don’t care because they don’t really need to care to achieve the solution of what they are dealing with. Nonetheless what would happen if we really care about it? Would this possible imply a side effect profit for Math?
I don’t know, still a way to much to learn. But lets wait and see what happens. Suddenly I feel like doing mathematical-physics, I should start contacting again all my Physicist friends…
Time for me to sleep
“Mathematicians are like the Physicist’s Lawyers… The second ones are pragmatic while the first ones’ main concern is always about the proceedings of the formalism details…” R.C.